<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Why Bank of America WILL Beat Analysts’ Estimates on Monday is the Key to Understanding Why a New Bull Market is Not Underway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2009/04/understanding-why-bank-of-america-will-beat-analysts%e2%80%99-estimates-on-monday-is-the-key-to-understanding-why-a-new-bull-market-is-not-underway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2009/04/understanding-why-bank-of-america-will-beat-analysts%e2%80%99-estimates-on-monday-is-the-key-to-understanding-why-a-new-bull-market-is-not-underway/</link>
	<description>The definitive investment blog for investment news not discussed in the mainstream media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:07:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Irrational Exuberance of the Green Shoots &#124; The Underground Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2009/04/understanding-why-bank-of-america-will-beat-analysts%e2%80%99-estimates-on-monday-is-the-key-to-understanding-why-a-new-bull-market-is-not-underway/comment-page-1/#comment-45586</link>
		<dc:creator>The Irrational Exuberance of the Green Shoots &#124; The Underground Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/?p=871#comment-45586</guid>
		<description>[...] a constant parade of “surprise earnings that beat analyst expectations.” Since I’ve already explained in this article how this con game works, I’m not going to elaborate too much how this scam works within the confines of this present [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a constant parade of “surprise earnings that beat analyst expectations.” Since I’ve already explained in this article how this con game works, I’m not going to elaborate too much how this scam works within the confines of this present [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lessons From the President. This is a Bear Market Rally. &#124; The Underground Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2009/04/understanding-why-bank-of-america-will-beat-analysts%e2%80%99-estimates-on-monday-is-the-key-to-understanding-why-a-new-bull-market-is-not-underway/comment-page-1/#comment-45499</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons From the President. This is a Bear Market Rally. &#124; The Underground Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/?p=871#comment-45499</guid>
		<description>[...] I warned that a big correction would likely be on the way in May in this article where I stated, it “would be best to heed the old investor cliché of Sell in May, Go Away.” If [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I warned that a big correction would likely be on the way in May in this article where I stated, it “would be best to heed the old investor cliché of Sell in May, Go Away.” If [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheeple123jump</title>
		<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2009/04/understanding-why-bank-of-america-will-beat-analysts%e2%80%99-estimates-on-monday-is-the-key-to-understanding-why-a-new-bull-market-is-not-underway/comment-page-1/#comment-45450</link>
		<dc:creator>sheeple123jump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/?p=871#comment-45450</guid>
		<description>...oh,...k....my bad....(smiles)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;oh,&#8230;k&#8230;.my bad&#8230;.(smiles)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2009/04/understanding-why-bank-of-america-will-beat-analysts%e2%80%99-estimates-on-monday-is-the-key-to-understanding-why-a-new-bull-market-is-not-underway/comment-page-1/#comment-45444</link>
		<dc:creator>J.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/?p=871#comment-45444</guid>
		<description>sheeple,

You&#039;re confusing bad credit deterioration with earnings. While BAC&#039;s credit outlook has massively deteriorated, this is a separate and distinct issue from its earnings report. The average estimate among a polled group of analysts according to Dow Jones news wire was for BAC to declare $0.03 profit per share on Monday. BAC delared a $0.44 profit per share, smashing analysts&#039; estimates. So my prediction came true exactly as I stated.

JS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sheeple,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re confusing bad credit deterioration with earnings. While BAC&#8217;s credit outlook has massively deteriorated, this is a separate and distinct issue from its earnings report. The average estimate among a polled group of analysts according to Dow Jones news wire was for BAC to declare $0.03 profit per share on Monday. BAC delared a $0.44 profit per share, smashing analysts&#8217; estimates. So my prediction came true exactly as I stated.</p>
<p>JS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheeple123jump</title>
		<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2009/04/understanding-why-bank-of-america-will-beat-analysts%e2%80%99-estimates-on-monday-is-the-key-to-understanding-why-a-new-bull-market-is-not-underway/comment-page-1/#comment-45440</link>
		<dc:creator>sheeple123jump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/?p=871#comment-45440</guid>
		<description>J.S. while I agree with your perspective...what some may call  a &#039;conspiracy theorist&#039; point of view....one that I share to en even greater extent...I think you owe  a more thorough explanation  of this  topic to your readers,heres my thought..... about what you said in tthis article.....&quot;Free markets and capitalism have been dead concepts for a long time  now in the U.S....&quot;  (I agree)....with....&quot;financial institutions resorting to more chicanery...&quot;...&quot;suspending mar-to-market accounting regulations...&quot; ...etc....&quot;...thus on monday,we can expect Bank of America to report earnings that beat analyst&#039;s estimates...&quot;(like goldman,wells fargo,citibank did...etc etc)
.....&quot;all part of the big con game...&quot;
&quot;It would indeed be IRONIC if B of A earnings underperform analysts expectations since I&#039;m so confident they will exceed them....&quot;....so I think you ought to address this .....&#039;wrong preiction&#039;....I have a few thoughts...  I completely agree with your point of view about the corruption of government  in the control of markets and thats its getting worse.... I dont think you are suspicious enough...I dont think it is &#039;ironic&#039; that Bof A earnings reports were worse .....I think it was planned.
 as a diversion as part of the plan, part of the scheme of market manipulation and control..... they are not playing a simple game , theyre playing a complex strategy game, with many moving parts...and it takes deeper analysis and better vision to &quot;see&quot; what they are doing and how they are doing it. 
 I think they faked the numbers up on the other banks and &#039;faked&#039; the numbers down on B of A in order to &#039;see&#039;  how the market responds to the &#039;bad news&#039; its like test driving the engine.... every thing they do  is done purposefully.... thats my conspiratorial point of view.... its all part of the big con game.... but your mistake was to only look at it from one or two chess moves ahead....  By releasing &quot;worse numbers&quot; of Bof A...they would  get a glimpse of ...market reaction.... like testing the waters, to see  what their next move needs to be. . I dont trust the game or the game controllers for a second.  the question is and will always be....how an we play this game along with them and save our wealth and maybe grow it  as well....? it takes more sophisticated understanding of the corrupt game and how its being played ..... the question to ask about this move  regarding the B of A  &#039;worse than expected numbers release&#039;....is  why did they do that? what was the public reaction to it...and what does that mean for the next moves they have planned. 
 its not ironic that  their report  was &#039;worse than expected&#039; it was Planned as a strategic move for a reason.  Like the other banks cooked numbers, B of A could easily have  released &quot;better than expected numbers&quot;  but they chose not to for a reason. thats the question we have to figure out,in order to play this corrupt game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.S. while I agree with your perspective&#8230;what some may call  a &#8216;conspiracy theorist&#8217; point of view&#8230;.one that I share to en even greater extent&#8230;I think you owe  a more thorough explanation  of this  topic to your readers,heres my thought&#8230;.. about what you said in tthis article&#8230;..&#8221;Free markets and capitalism have been dead concepts for a long time  now in the U.S&#8230;.&#8221;  (I agree)&#8230;.with&#8230;.&#8221;financial institutions resorting to more chicanery&#8230;&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;suspending mar-to-market accounting regulations&#8230;&#8221; &#8230;etc&#8230;.&#8221;&#8230;thus on monday,we can expect Bank of America to report earnings that beat analyst&#8217;s estimates&#8230;&#8221;(like goldman,wells fargo,citibank did&#8230;etc etc)<br />
&#8230;..&#8221;all part of the big con game&#8230;&#8221;<br />
&#8220;It would indeed be IRONIC if B of A earnings underperform analysts expectations since I&#8217;m so confident they will exceed them&#8230;.&#8221;&#8230;.so I think you ought to address this &#8230;..&#8217;wrong preiction&#8217;&#8230;.I have a few thoughts&#8230;  I completely agree with your point of view about the corruption of government  in the control of markets and thats its getting worse&#8230;. I dont think you are suspicious enough&#8230;I dont think it is &#8216;ironic&#8217; that Bof A earnings reports were worse &#8230;..I think it was planned.<br />
 as a diversion as part of the plan, part of the scheme of market manipulation and control&#8230;.. they are not playing a simple game , theyre playing a complex strategy game, with many moving parts&#8230;and it takes deeper analysis and better vision to &#8220;see&#8221; what they are doing and how they are doing it.<br />
 I think they faked the numbers up on the other banks and &#8216;faked&#8217; the numbers down on B of A in order to &#8216;see&#8217;  how the market responds to the &#8216;bad news&#8217; its like test driving the engine&#8230;. every thing they do  is done purposefully&#8230;. thats my conspiratorial point of view&#8230;. its all part of the big con game&#8230;. but your mistake was to only look at it from one or two chess moves ahead&#8230;.  By releasing &#8220;worse numbers&#8221; of Bof A&#8230;they would  get a glimpse of &#8230;market reaction&#8230;. like testing the waters, to see  what their next move needs to be. . I dont trust the game or the game controllers for a second.  the question is and will always be&#8230;.how an we play this game along with them and save our wealth and maybe grow it  as well&#8230;.? it takes more sophisticated understanding of the corrupt game and how its being played &#8230;.. the question to ask about this move  regarding the B of A  &#8216;worse than expected numbers release&#8217;&#8230;.is  why did they do that? what was the public reaction to it&#8230;and what does that mean for the next moves they have planned.<br />
 its not ironic that  their report  was &#8216;worse than expected&#8217; it was Planned as a strategic move for a reason.  Like the other banks cooked numbers, B of A could easily have  released &#8220;better than expected numbers&#8221;  but they chose not to for a reason. thats the question we have to figure out,in order to play this corrupt game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2009/04/understanding-why-bank-of-america-will-beat-analysts%e2%80%99-estimates-on-monday-is-the-key-to-understanding-why-a-new-bull-market-is-not-underway/comment-page-1/#comment-45410</link>
		<dc:creator>J.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/?p=871#comment-45410</guid>
		<description>Jack, as always everything always comes down to timing, especially in these markets. You may do quite well with your plays above. However, it is good to see a &quot;truth&quot; movement developing in the financial industry because I for one, certainly believe that it needs an overhaul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, as always everything always comes down to timing, especially in these markets. You may do quite well with your plays above. However, it is good to see a &#8220;truth&#8221; movement developing in the financial industry because I for one, certainly believe that it needs an overhaul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Trujillo</title>
		<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2009/04/understanding-why-bank-of-america-will-beat-analysts%e2%80%99-estimates-on-monday-is-the-key-to-understanding-why-a-new-bull-market-is-not-underway/comment-page-1/#comment-45405</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Trujillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/?p=871#comment-45405</guid>
		<description>J. S., I know the way you think and i´m on your side, by all means, cause I trully believe (sadly for me and everyone) we´re heading towards a very deeps crisis here, based on your accurate and sincere predictions.
Thinking as a gambler on the Casino, wouldn´t be possible to bet against this market during May with ultrashort ETF´s as SKF or FAZ maybe? It might be a high risk move (moreover considering your prior article about the 700+ Trillion Bubble), but a wealthy one if timing is ok?

As always, thank you for your commitment on talking just the truth.

Jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. S., I know the way you think and i´m on your side, by all means, cause I trully believe (sadly for me and everyone) we´re heading towards a very deeps crisis here, based on your accurate and sincere predictions.<br />
Thinking as a gambler on the Casino, wouldn´t be possible to bet against this market during May with ultrashort ETF´s as SKF or FAZ maybe? It might be a high risk move (moreover considering your prior article about the 700+ Trillion Bubble), but a wealthy one if timing is ok?</p>
<p>As always, thank you for your commitment on talking just the truth.</p>
<p>Jack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
