Understanding Why Bank of America WILL Beat Analysts’ Estimates on Monday is the Key to Understanding Why a New Bull Market is Not Underway
Though I’m writing this article on the Saturday preceding the Monday Bank of America earning’s announcement, I am quite confident in stating that the chances Bank of America will not surprise and beat analysts on Monday is slim to none. I can state this without reading a single word about what the analysts are predicting in terms of earnings and without scrutinizing any pre-earnings hints from Bank of America executives. I can state this for the same reason that I knew Wells Fargo would surprise the market to the upside, why Goldman Sachs would surprise the market to the upside and why I wrote just last Friday on this very blog that Citigroup would surprise to the upside before they announced their earnings.
I can say this because I know that free markets and capitalism have been dead concepts for a long time now in the United States. Though we, as Americans, would like to cling to the delusion that we are a capitalistic nation that honors free market principles, capitalism has long been dead and that’s how I know beyond a shadow of doubt that Bank of America’s earnings will beat analysts’ expectations come Monday morning. You see, the honor of the American financial system has been in shambles for decades and has devolved to the point that it now consistently mirrors the high levels of corruption we, as Americans, typically associate with emerging markets. The very regulatory agencies that we, as investors, trust to protect us, such as the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), do not regulate but instead protect fraudulent activities.
During the bull markets of the early 1990s, if you ever tried to convince any American with a $1 million+ portfolio of investing in emerging markets, the likely response would have been something similar to the following: “Russia, China, and Turkey? Are you kidding? Those countries are so corrupt you never know what you’re buying. Thanks, but no thanks. I’ll think I’ll keep my money in markets I know I can trust.” And that was that, end of discussion.
However, today, our markets have become so corrupt that they now resemble the capital markets of emerging countries where the lack of a strong regulatory environment enables very few financial oligarchs to strong-arm the system and heavily bias it in their favor to the detriment of the rest of their countrymen. What do I mean by this? Let’s take a trip down memory lane and review the major events that have led to bear-market rallies in US markets in the past 18-months, and consider if there has been one not tinged with corruption and principles that stand in opposition to free markets? There was the US Federal Reserve led bailout of Bear Stearns by JP Morgan, an act that led even former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker to criticize in response: “”The Federal Reserve has judged it necessary to take actions that extend to the very edge of its lawful and implied powers, transcending in the process certain long-embedded central banking principles and practices.”
When the failure of many US banking institutions to employ any type of risk-management principles subsequently created very illiquid operational capacities that threatened their ability to survive, the SEC stepped in an in an unprecedented move to change laws and temporarily ban short selling of approximately 800 US financial stocks. When AIG was about to collapse and default on billions of CDS (Credit Default Swaps) instruments that they held, our very own US Secretary of Treasury Hank Paulson swiftly intervened and personally ensured that AIG would receive billions of dollars of hand out money. And of course, we have not even mentioned the trillions of other bailout money allocated to Citigroup, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and numerous other financial behemoths nor the everyday workings of the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets to intervene and prevent free markets from taking their natural course. In every one of the above instances, which are just a few of the numerous actions that top financial executives and government executives have executed that have interfered with free-market behavior, who directly benefited from these actions? The American people or a few corrupt wealthy oligarchs?
When all of these “solutions” inevitably failed because none of them actually accomplished anything other than re-directing money out of the pockets of all Americans and into the pockets of a few corrupt men, the financial institutions resorted to more chicanery such as changing their definition of bad debt from 120 days to 180 days (a tactic employed by Wells Fargo) or merely ensuring that they could value their assets at whatever price they deemed reasonable even if markets found their valuations to be ludicrous (a tactic accomplished once the financial companies were able to convince FASB to suspend mark-to-market accounting regulations). Thus, on Monday, we can expect Bank of America to declare earnings that beat analysts’ estimates, because most analysts, just like the regulators, are also part of this big con game. Many times analysts are “prepped” by financial companies Public Relations employees that purposely feed them massively negative information that they know is inaccurate. Analysts then take this information like willing children and prepare reports based upon this misinformation. Consequently, when the time then comes for earnings announcements, markets have been prepped by analysts to expect negative results that were never accurate, and financial companies are able to release earnings that “surprise” the markets.

Outside of the con games that continually are played by financial institutions, here are four more reasons why this rally will end very shortly.
(1) Financial stocks have led this recent rally, but there is nothing fundamentally strong about any of the financial companies whose share prices have led the broad markets higher recently;
(2) If we look at the charts of individual financial stocks, volume has been weak on these rallies. Many financial stocks have probably rallied more on short-covering than anything else, and thus the rallies will not be sustainable;
(3) If we look at a chart of a broader US market index above, such as the S&P 500, you will notice that the rally has occurred on decreasing volume and that a doji-star candle formation, often a sign of an imminent reversal, just formed Friday. Though the MACD is still clearly positive, the MACD is a lagging indicator; and
(4) Markets in the short-term often behave irrationally but long-term fundamentals drive markets in the long-term. This current rally has been fully irrational and has no legs. Look at the macroeconomic state today – record unemployment rates, a financial system still in utter disrepair, a commercial real estate market that is about to burst and so on. Nothing in the macroeconomic outlook points to this rally continuing nor being sustainable.
It would indeed be ironic if Bank of America’s earnings underperform analysts’ expectations since I’m so confident they will exceed them. However, even if I’m wrong about this, you won’t find me in any traditional stocks in any global market come this May for there are far better and less riskier ways to create wealth from this ongoing monetary crisis. For the above four reasons, one would be best to heed the old investor cliché of Sell in May, Go Away.
Related Posts
Posted: Saturday, April 18th, 2009 @ 1:58 pm
Categories: Financial Crisis, Dollar Crisis, & Recession Proof.
Tags: stock market rally will end.
Subscribe to the comments feed if you like.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.





April 18th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
J. S., I know the way you think and i´m on your side, by all means, cause I trully believe (sadly for me and everyone) we´re heading towards a very deeps crisis here, based on your accurate and sincere predictions.
Thinking as a gambler on the Casino, wouldn´t be possible to bet against this market during May with ultrashort ETF´s as SKF or FAZ maybe? It might be a high risk move (moreover considering your prior article about the 700+ Trillion Bubble), but a wealthy one if timing is ok?
As always, thank you for your commitment on talking just the truth.
Jack.
April 20th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
Jack, as always everything always comes down to timing, especially in these markets. You may do quite well with your plays above. However, it is good to see a “truth” movement developing in the financial industry because I for one, certainly believe that it needs an overhaul.
April 24th, 2009 at 12:33 am
J.S. while I agree with your perspective…what some may call a ‘conspiracy theorist’ point of view….one that I share to en even greater extent…I think you owe a more thorough explanation of this topic to your readers,heres my thought….. about what you said in tthis article…..”Free markets and capitalism have been dead concepts for a long time now in the U.S….” (I agree)….with….”financial institutions resorting to more chicanery…”…”suspending mar-to-market accounting regulations…” …etc….”…thus on monday,we can expect Bank of America to report earnings that beat analyst’s estimates…”(like goldman,wells fargo,citibank did…etc etc)
…..”all part of the big con game…”
“It would indeed be IRONIC if B of A earnings underperform analysts expectations since I’m so confident they will exceed them….”….so I think you ought to address this …..’wrong preiction’….I have a few thoughts… I completely agree with your point of view about the corruption of government in the control of markets and thats its getting worse…. I dont think you are suspicious enough…I dont think it is ‘ironic’ that Bof A earnings reports were worse …..I think it was planned.
as a diversion as part of the plan, part of the scheme of market manipulation and control….. they are not playing a simple game , theyre playing a complex strategy game, with many moving parts…and it takes deeper analysis and better vision to “see” what they are doing and how they are doing it.
I think they faked the numbers up on the other banks and ‘faked’ the numbers down on B of A in order to ‘see’ how the market responds to the ‘bad news’ its like test driving the engine…. every thing they do is done purposefully…. thats my conspiratorial point of view…. its all part of the big con game…. but your mistake was to only look at it from one or two chess moves ahead…. By releasing “worse numbers” of Bof A…they would get a glimpse of …market reaction…. like testing the waters, to see what their next move needs to be. . I dont trust the game or the game controllers for a second. the question is and will always be….how an we play this game along with them and save our wealth and maybe grow it as well….? it takes more sophisticated understanding of the corrupt game and how its being played ….. the question to ask about this move regarding the B of A ‘worse than expected numbers release’….is why did they do that? what was the public reaction to it…and what does that mean for the next moves they have planned.
its not ironic that their report was ‘worse than expected’ it was Planned as a strategic move for a reason. Like the other banks cooked numbers, B of A could easily have released “better than expected numbers” but they chose not to for a reason. thats the question we have to figure out,in order to play this corrupt game.
April 24th, 2009 at 6:28 am
sheeple,
You’re confusing bad credit deterioration with earnings. While BAC’s credit outlook has massively deteriorated, this is a separate and distinct issue from its earnings report. The average estimate among a polled group of analysts according to Dow Jones news wire was for BAC to declare $0.03 profit per share on Monday. BAC delared a $0.44 profit per share, smashing analysts’ estimates. So my prediction came true exactly as I stated.
JS
April 26th, 2009 at 3:46 am
…oh,…k….my bad….(smiles)
May 14th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
[...] I warned that a big correction would likely be on the way in May in this article where I stated, it “would be best to heed the old investor cliché of Sell in May, Go Away.” If [...]
July 24th, 2009 at 4:14 am
[...] a constant parade of “surprise earnings that beat analyst expectations.” Since I’ve already explained in this article how this con game works, I’m not going to elaborate too much how this scam works within the confines of this present [...]