Archive for April, 2008
April 30, 2008
In a couple of hours, we’ll soon find out how low the Fed will go in their attempt to inflate their way out of the current subprime/housing market/financial sector mess that we are currently mired in. Last March 18th, the Federal Reserve cleverly manufactured a downturn in the commodities sector off of a 0.75% rate cut to the Feds Fund rate after futures markets had shown their hand by forecasting the probability of a 1.00% or greater cut at 100%. The market then illogically interpreted this less than expected rate cut as a sure sign that the Feds must have fighting inflation as their new priority despite its clear willingness to sacrifice the dollar for the past several months. So what will it do this time around?
Well, there really is no sense in making a prediction because who knows what they will do? I don’t and neither does the futures market. However, what they do will clearly outline their thought processes about the future. Could they have saved the additional 0.25% rate cut that everyone expected in March for this rate cut so they can surprise everyone again with a deeper than expected rate cut this time that will undoubtedly continue to feed this stock market rally? Read more …
April 30th, 2008
April 23, 2008
Every time I’ve written about the imminent disaster that awaits U.S. stock markets, and subsequently global markets, the response has been overwhelmingly negative. In 2007, when I warned of steep declines in U.S. markets that were on the way in 2008, I was called everything from unpatriotic, to un-American, to even unholy. When steep declines indeed hit the markets to begin 2008 and gold soared to $850, (fulfilling my September 2007 prediction of $850 gold by January 1, 2008), the name-callers merely disappeared. It’s not that I revel in markets struggling and the still very real possibility of it shedding great value. In fact, I’d be ecstatic if the U.S. markets looked healthy and an imminent rise to a 16,000 Dow was realistic, with an upward surge taking all global markets along for the ride. Good money can be made in great markets or terrible markets so it doesn’t really matter either way. It’s amazing that people think I have an agenda for wanting markets to crash, oddly connecting my market sentiments to arguments about patriotism or religion. It’s just that I feel obliged to report what I see, because so few nuggets of reality trickle through the mainstream information filters and reach larger audiences.
People seem to forget one central and critical point. Most people seem to believe that they have to lose a great deal of money when crises materialize and forget that it is absolutely possible to prosper during crises as well. Thus, because they feel they must suffer during a crisis, the “shoot the messenger of bad news” syndrome commences. That said, I’m still going to state my utter lack of faith in this mini-rally that the U.S. markets are currently experiencing. Due to the huge levels of unaddressed and unsolved risk that still simmers quite potently beneath the surface, with the current “solutions” being implemented today, I honestly can only see two outcomes. Crash now or crash later.
Should an extended rally of the Dow above 13,000 occur, it will serve no purpose other than to create the illusion of wealth, as opposed to the creation of real tangible wealth. The higher U.S. markets rise in today’s environment, the more likely it is that they will fall even harder in the future. Here’s why. Read more …
April 23rd, 2008
April 17, 2008 -
On April 15th, the U.S. markets rallied, with the DJIA adding more than 250 points (2.08%) and the S&P 500 adding more than 30 points (2.27%). Of course, this brought out the mandatory Wall Street cheerleaders and numerous stories that FINALLY, it appears that the U.S. markets are starting to turn the corner. As could be expected, other major global markets with close ties to the U.S. markets followed suit the following day as they also rallied by about 2% or more. Numerous stories appeared in the media extolling the resiliency of global stock markets and the “upbeat” earnings of U.S. companies that propelled this big one-day rally. Stories soon followed of “super-cycle” bull markets in the U.S. still being intact, and that this one-day rally is the impetus that would propel the U.S. DJIA to 14,000 or possibly even 16,000 points and take the rest of the global stock markets along for the ride. My response? Don’t believe the hype.
If we take a closer look at the headlines that sung the praises of “upbeat” earnings of U.S. companies such as J.P. Morgan, Intel, and Wells Fargo, we’ll discover that the word “upbeat” has been changed in meaning. “Upbeat” in the financial world does not conform to the Webster dictionary definition of “cheerful”, and “optimistic”, but instead has been distorted to mean “bad, but not as bad as the expectations that have been carefully created and molded by CEOs just prior to earnings releases so that earnings can beat expectations”. Even then, this modified definition of upbeat for the expediency of the financial industry may not stand the test of time as most companies still seem to be less than forthcoming about the problems that continue to plague their companies and the overarching economy. Read more …
April 17th, 2008
April 17, 2008
Consider this. If you owned a prime piece of real estate in 2001 that was valued at $1.8 million that cost 7,200 ounces of gold to buy it back then (at a price of about $250 an ounce), and if you could now sell that same property and receive $2.6 million for it, even at this inflated price, it would now require less than 2,800 ounces of gold (at about $930 an ounce). So while you may have become richer in the paper currency of U.S. dollars, this increase in paper dollars does not mean much if this increase in paper will enable you to buy less “stuff” today. Certainly, despite the inflated price of this property in paper dollars, you have become much poorer in ounces of gold (real currency). Thus, Central Banks, by inflating money, create the illusion of growing wealth when in fact they are stealing wealth from right underneath our very noses. This is EXACTLY what Alan Greenspan meant when he said “deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth”. By the way, Mr. Greenspan was only bold enough to make such a statement in 1966, decades BEFORE he knew that he would eventually became the Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve.
Perhaps, an even easier way to understand the above illustration is as follows. Read more …
April 17th, 2008
