Possible U.S. Military Intervention in Iran Profit, Don’t Lose from Market Corrections

The Next Cold War Will be an Economic One

April 1st, 2007

April 1, 2007- Several big stories hit the financial news this past week but the real significance of these stories were not discussed anywhere. Number one, the U.S. Congress pushed to file unfair trade practices against China, stating that the Bush administration’s quiet behind-the-scenes negotiation strategy was unacceptable as a tactic to bring economic reform to China.u.s. china trade war In another story this week, these words appeared - Rather than serve as “an apologist” for China, “I hope the administration will join this team,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told reporters after testifying before the Senate Finance Committee in the second hearing on China’s economic and currency policies in two days.

This article reported that Congress aimed to pass bi-partisan veto-proof legislation that will force the Chinese Yuan to appreciate against the dollar. American manufacturers have claimed that the Chinese government’s unfair manipulation of their currency has hurt them and their Congressmen are listening. Then finally at the end of the week, this headline appeared in an article: “The U.S. Commerce Department announced sanctions against paper imports from China, the first time in 23 years that U.S. duty law has been applied to imports from that country.”

Reporting the above is fine, but what are its implications? Here is my view. For once, I agree that the Bush administration is taking the proper stance and their disapproval of these brash, flag-waving Congressmen is merited. U.S. Congressmen, as a group, are not known to be the brightest of individuals and in this instance, when sending U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke and the U.S. Secretary of Treasury Paulson to China only resulted in China defiantly stating that they will not allow another nation to dictate to them how they should run their economy, U.S. Congress should have gotten the hint. Instead, they escalated an already potentially volatile situation with their threats and sanctions this week.

Stephen Roach, the chief economist at Morgan Stanley warned Congress that currency valuation was far from being the sole component hurting American manufacturers. He stated that China’s cheap labor costs, burgeoning modern infrastructure and technology and growing investment in human capital and research also have greatly contributed to the burgeoning trade imbalance between China and the United States. Mr. Roach commented, “The foreign-exchange rate is not the answer, in my view. You in the Congress need to ask yourselves an important hypothetical question: How would you feel if you got your way on the Chinese currency adjustment but found that after three or four years the pressures bearing down on American workers had only intensified? As I see it, that’s a very real risk that should not be taken lightly.

Although I have vehemently disagreed with Mr. Roach’s past views on other subject matters, I believe that he is on the mark 100% this time and I’ll tell you why. U.S. Federal Chairman Bernanke has already publicly stated that everybody knows that the weak dollar is good for the U.S. government because it makes their debt cheaper and also helps to close the trade gap. So if you think that the U.S. is not guilty of manipulating their own currency as well to serve their purposes then you are living in some kind of economic fantasyland. There are a whole lot of American expats living abroad that would like to see their own government do something to better manage and protect the value of their own currency instead of lecturing other nations as to how they should be protecting the value of theirs. Furthermore, this event is indeed a watershed event in the ongoing re-structuring of the world’s economies. In the past, colonized nations had bitterly complained to Europe and the U.S. about the harm their economic policies inflicted upon their economies. But now we see a 180% reversal, with developed countries complaining to emerging nations about their policies.

But this is almost beside the point when it comes to examining much more significant fallout of an open trade war with China. The reason the Bush administration is trying to negotiate quietly with the Chinese rather than take the more hard-line stance assumed by the U.S. Congress is that they know that the Chinese government holds far more important cards than the valuation of the Yuan, namely the more than one trillion dollars of U.S. dollar denominated assets that they currently hold in their reserves.

As I stated in a blog I posted about a week ago, the U.S. Congress would be foolish to aggressively alienate the Chinese government with so much at stake. The problems with the U.S. economy are much more a product of past U.S. fiscal irresponsibility than the manipulative actions of the Chinese economy and if the U.S. chooses to try to scapegoat an economic giant like China for their current problems, I believe, as Mr. Roach stated, that re-valuation of the Yuan will not be the answer. Furthermore, it is exactly these protectionist measures that the U.S. is seeking to implement that have hindered emerging markets in the past.

Instead of addressing the real reasons behind a lagging economy, protectionist measures many times seek to scapegoat another country’s economic policies for far more deep-rooted economic failures at home and harbors and encourages domestic inefficiencies to persist instead of being solved. In fact, if the U.S. Congress pushes through their punitive measures, I can tell you right now that revaluation of the Yuan will NOT be the answer to the problems of the American economy. And despite the fact that offloading massive amounts of U.S. dollars will hurt the Chinese economy as well, there will also come a time when the Chinese government, if pushed far enough, will offload massive amounts of U.S. dollars because their strong economy will be able to absorb its negative effects much better than the weak U.S. economy.

And if they do so, the U.S. Congress will have given them the perfect excuse to do something that I believe the Chinese government is planning to do anyway. However, they will be able to do it, save face at the same time, and do it earlier than anyone expects, as opposed to having the global community heap loads of criticism upon them for what would otherwise seem to be a sudden decision that came out of nowhere. Instead of such an action being viewed as the selfish actions of a nation, it will instead by viewed as a reaction to U.S. bullying, and U.S. Congress will have given the Chinese government the perfect out.

In this case, quiet negotiations is the proper choice because any other way is bound to bring harm to not only Americans in the future, but to the global economy as well. When I have blogged about governments being chronic liars in the past, certainly the Chinese government or any other world government is not immune. While the Chinese government has publicly stated that they will not take any sudden actions that will greatly hurt the U.S. dollar, do you really believe that they want to hold a trillion dollars of a currency that continues to lose significant value every year? Trust me, they are planning to get rid of these dollars as soon as economically possible and behind the scenes, they have a plan in place to offload them. Everybody always states that the Chinese need to keep buying U.S. dollars in order to keep their own currency weak and to keep feeding their export growth as if this is the only solution to their problem.

Again, I can tell you why punitive Congressional U.S. measures will not coax the Chinese to assume policies the U.S. wants but only anger them. To begin, Japan is on the verge of replacing America as China’s number one trading partner. If the Chinese choose to bow down to American pressure, they would undoubtedly anger the Japanese who have heavily invested in China and would be greatly adversely affected by a significant strengthening of the Yuan if the Chinese government’s decided to appease the U.S. Congress. Angering your number one trading partner would be even worse than angering the U.S. And this just in, even as I write this blog, in a report originating out of New York:

Today, China called the first of U.S. protectionist measures, tariffs on their paper imports, “unacceptable.” China strongly demands the United States to reconsider this decision and correct it as soon as possible,” China Commerce Ministry spokesman Wang Xinpei said in a statement on a government Web site.

Secondly, despite what diplomatic statements the Chinese government releases to the financial press about being concerned not to enact any policies that will cause the U.S. dollar to fall quickly,I believe that they secretly desire to unload a significant portion of their $1 trillion dollar of U.S. dollar-denominated reserves. The Chinese government realizes that offloading significant portions of dollars, whether it is to purchase oil and natural gas for their state reserves, or the purchase of other assets, will automatically cause the Yuan to strengthen. They are not going to appease the U.S. Congress now and watch the Yuan strengthen and then see this effect multiply as they unload U.S. dollars from their reserves. I believe that this is how the Chinese will eventually allow the Yuan to strengthen – by merely cutting back on their dollar-denominated assets, something that they want to do anyhow. Simply holding on to such massive amounts of risk-filled currency to allow your export industry to keep humming along is certainly unwise and the Chinese know this as well.

With this potential trade war, it is important to ignore the preening of the U.S. Congress but to consider the implications of their potential actions instead. U.S. Congressmen are no doubt influenced a great deal by their most important constituents, in this case, large manufacturers. However, in this case, it is not the concerns of the large manufacturers that are most important. Here they serve merely as a smokescreen. Sure, large manufacturers are being hurt right now by Chinese imports, but rather than considering this part of the equation which the financial media gives much attention to, it is more important to consider the other side of the equation that is never spoken of in the financial media. Rather than listen to the complaints of the hurt, seek out what the very wealthiest of individuals are doing to not just protect their assets as the geo-political balance progresses towards a tipping point, but how they are positioning their assets now to prepare to profit from these future crises. As is a common theme at the Underground Investor, sometimes the loudest chatter will distract you from the most important information, that which is happening underneath this chatter. And if you are a SmartKnowledgeU Member, you already know you should be positioning your assets now.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

More on this topic (What's this?)
Roubini Foresees Chinese Hard Landing
China Wants the Dollar to Drop Dead
Read more on U.S. – China Trade Dispute, Investing in China at Wikinvest

Entry Filed under: China Investments, Financial Crisis, Dollar Crisis, & Recession Proof, Politics and stocks

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. The Underground Investor &hellip  |  November 8th, 2007 at 9:22 am

    [...] Sept. 19, 2007 - Signs of a Peak Investment Crisis Keep Coming June 18, 2007 -  Alan Greenspan’s Call of Checkmate on China is Premature June 17, 2007 -  PIMCO’s Bill Gross and the Economist Agree with SmartKnowledgeU 6 Months After the Fact! May 28, 2007 -   The Politics of Higher Oil Prices May 26, 2007 -   Asian Countries Pooling Reserves to Protect Themselves from the Incredible Shrinking Dollar, Part II May 25, 2007 -   Asian Countries Pooling Reserves, Part I  May 3, 2007 -     The Death of the 3-Year Treasury Note  Apr. 1, 2007 -    The Next Cold War Will be an Economic One  Jan. 25, 2007 -   Dollar-Denominated Bonds Faltering  Jan. 9, 2007 -    Use the Longtail of Investing to Accurately Predict Dollar Behavior  Jan 7, 2007 -     10 Reasons Why Dollar-Denominate Bonds Aren’t Safe  Dec. 21, 2006 -  Iran Presents More Trouble for the U.S. Dollar  Dec. 7, 2006 -    The U.S. has Perfected the Incredible Shrinking Dollar  [...]

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Seeking Alpha Certified




    Watch our YouTube
    Videos about the
    Monetary Crisis by
    clicking on the logo
    above!





Support independent publishing: buy this book on Lulu.

    Learn the dirty little secrets that investment firms don't want you to know. Click on the image above & learn how to position yourself to benefit, instead of lose, from the crisis!


SmartKnowledgeU™ e-book "Rich Investor, Poor Investor

  • RSS Feeds

      To read a simple explanation of how subscribing to our RSS feed can help you stay informed of our new posts and insure that you don't miss any of our important posts, Click here

                   Add to Technorati Favorites
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Add to My AOL
  • About

      J.S. Kim is the Founder & Managing Director of SmartKnowledgeU™, LLC. He attended the University of Pennsylvania, and received a double master in Business Administration and Public Policy from the University of Texas at Austin. Read more...

    • Kaeho's Corner

      Kaeho is a master martial arts practitioner who has trained in Kyokyushinkai Karate, Mansekan Aikido, Seidokan Aikido, Ba Gua, Chin na, Jui-Jutsu, Aiki-Jutsu, and Gung Fu. Read more...

  • The Underground Investor™

  • Search














  • Posts by Month