<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investors Should Apply the Rules of Shopping 101 to Buying Stocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2007/02/07/a-they-dont-apply-the-rules-of-shopping-101-to-buying-stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2007/02/07/a-they-dont-apply-the-rules-of-shopping-101-to-buying-stocks/</link>
	<description>The definitive investment blog for investment news not discussed in the mainstream media</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Underground Investor - safest places to invest money, achieve financial freedom, gold, uranium, silver, global stock market news &#187; A: Uranium Stocks</title>
		<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2007/02/07/a-they-dont-apply-the-rules-of-shopping-101-to-buying-stocks/#comment-5753</link>
		<dc:creator>The Underground Investor - safest places to invest money, achieve financial freedom, gold, uranium, silver, global stock market news &#187; A: Uranium Stocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 03:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smartknowledgeu.com/blog/2007/02/07/a-they-dont-apply-the-rules-of-shopping-101-to-buying-stocks/#comment-5753</guid>
		<description>[...] In fact, though all paid –up SmartKnowledgeU members knew that uranium was specifically the reason why I liked BHP so much as a safe low-risk, high reward play, I, in fact, alluded to BHP’s potential in my February 7th, 2007 blog entitled They Don’t Apply the Rules of Shopping 101 to Buying Stocks. Back then, although I had owned BHP for quite some time already, I wrote this: “Let’s take BHP Billiton, the world’s largest, diversified mining company, to illustrate the point of this blog entry. For the past couple of months, when BHP Billiton was trading below $40 a share, and it stayed below $40 a share for a long time, I told several friends that were looking for something to buy that BHP under $40 a share was a good buy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In fact, though all paid –up SmartKnowledgeU members knew that uranium was specifically the reason why I liked BHP so much as a safe low-risk, high reward play, I, in fact, alluded to BHP’s potential in my February 7th, 2007 blog entitled They Don’t Apply the Rules of Shopping 101 to Buying Stocks. Back then, although I had owned BHP for quite some time already, I wrote this: “Let’s take BHP Billiton, the world’s largest, diversified mining company, to illustrate the point of this blog entry. For the past couple of months, when BHP Billiton was trading below $40 a share, and it stayed below $40 a share for a long time, I told several friends that were looking for something to buy that BHP under $40 a share was a good buy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
