<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A: I’m Not Looking So Smart&#8230;Yet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2006/09/a-i%e2%80%99m-not-looking-so-smart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2006/09/a-i%e2%80%99m-not-looking-so-smart/</link>
	<description>The definitive investment blog for investment news not discussed in the mainstream media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Underground Investor - safest places to invest money, achieve financial freedom, gold, uranium, silver, global stock market news &#187; A: The Underground Investor Continues to Scoop the Global Financial Press</title>
		<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2006/09/a-i%e2%80%99m-not-looking-so-smart/comment-page-1/#comment-6401</link>
		<dc:creator>The Underground Investor - safest places to invest money, achieve financial freedom, gold, uranium, silver, global stock market news &#187; A: The Underground Investor Continues to Scoop the Global Financial Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 11:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smartknowledgeu.com/blog/2006/09/25/a-i%e2%80%99m-not-looking-so-smart/#comment-6401</guid>
		<description>[...] May 22, 2007 - On September 25 of last year, I blogged about the close relationship of Goldman Sachs and the U.S. government and how it was more likely than not that Goldman Sachs dumping of 72.66% of the unleaded gas position in its commodities index right before the mid-term Congressional elections was most likely politically motivated. The following week, the New York Times wrote the exact same article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] May 22, 2007 &#8211; On September 25 of last year, I blogged about the close relationship of Goldman Sachs and the U.S. government and how it was more likely than not that Goldman Sachs dumping of 72.66% of the unleaded gas position in its commodities index right before the mid-term Congressional elections was most likely politically motivated. The following week, the New York Times wrote the exact same article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Zen of Investing - SmartKnowledgeU™ &#187; A: You Can Fool Some People Sometimes</title>
		<link>http://www.theundergroundinvestor.com/2006/09/a-i%e2%80%99m-not-looking-so-smart/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>The Zen of Investing - SmartKnowledgeU™ &#187; A: You Can Fool Some People Sometimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smartknowledgeu.com/blog/2006/09/25/a-i%e2%80%99m-not-looking-so-smart/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>[...] The main reason most people believe that consumer confidence shot up in September was due to falling gas prices. If you read my blog entry dated September 25th here, you’ll see that I believe that falling gas prices were artificially manufactured by Goldman Sachs (by the way, five days after my post, the New York Times also ran a story on September 30th addressing the points I had raised in my September 25th blog). So if consumer confidence rises on artificially induced manipulation of gas prices and the unleaded gas markets, what do they mean? Absolutely nothing. Tags: &#124;consumer confidence index, investment myths, media foolishness stocks&#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The main reason most people believe that consumer confidence shot up in September was due to falling gas prices. If you read my blog entry dated September 25th here, you’ll see that I believe that falling gas prices were artificially manufactured by Goldman Sachs (by the way, five days after my post, the New York Times also ran a story on September 30th addressing the points I had raised in my September 25th blog). So if consumer confidence rises on artificially induced manipulation of gas prices and the unleaded gas markets, what do they mean? Absolutely nothing. Tags: |consumer confidence index, investment myths, media foolishness stocks| [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

