The Days of Buy and Hold are Over Following Mainstream Financial Media Will Lead You Down a Disastrous Road of Investing

What Country Has the Worst Stock Market in the Developed World?

August 16th, 2006

August 16, 2006 -

When it comes to investing, nothing kills good returns more than nationalism. And nationalism rules at large investment firms.

In mid-2006, as you can see from the chart below,the major U.S. stock market index, the S&P 500 stands exactly at the same level it stood seven and a half years ago at about 1,250. So over seven and a half years if your portfolio has tracked the S&P 500’s index as some 97% of U.S. professional money managers aim to do, you have about the same amount of money you had seven and a half years ago – only with the rapid deflation of the dollar, your same amount of dollars buys much less today, so in all actuality, tracking the index has lost you money. That’s a whole lot of waiting for a whole lot of nothing.

Sandp.jpg

And that’s the good news.

The bad news is, as of 2006, the U.S. stock market’s performance will likely become even worse for the rest of this decade.

Why?

America is a Debtor Nation that is Sinking Under the Weight of Its Debt

For starters, check out the poor credit quality of thousands of American companies, many of which like the American consumer, seem to be overleveraged in debt.

Standard & Poors, a highly respected financial services firm that ranks the credit ratings of corporations all over the world, released a report on May 24, 2006 that declared a “Downgrade Potential Across Credit Grades and Sectors.” Standard and Poors covers corporations based in Asia/Pacific, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and the U.S.

This report stated that 85% of the corporations at risk for a potential downgrade in their credit rating (a rating that judges the corporation’s ongoing financial viability) were based in the U.S. or Europe, with the majority (61%) based in the U.S.

A breakdown by sector looks even worse. 80% of the corporations at risk within the automotive industry for a credit downgrade, 88% within the consumer product industry, and 88% of the retail/restaurant industry were all BASED IN THE U.S.

And don’t think that these statistics are skewed because the U.S. constitutes the largest percentage of the global stock market capitalization. According to a February, 2006 Forbes Online report, 75% of all publicly traded companies are non- U.S. based corporations.

But back to my opening statement:

When it comes to investing, nothing kills good returns more than nationalism. And nationalism rules at large investment firms.

To illustrate this point, it’s not just the small cap stocks, but also the large cap stocks of foreign countries that don’t trade on the stock exchanges of other countries. The overwhelming majority of clients at large investment firms don’t hold some of the leading, most innovative, most well-managed and fastest growing companies simply because these stocks are not traded on their domestic stock markets. For example, Samsung, a Korean company that is a world leader in high-end electronic goods, and LVMH (Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy) a French company that is a world leader in luxury brand goods including Pucci, Fendi, Tag Heuer, Sephora, Dom Perignon, Moet & Chandon, Givenchy, DKNY, and Hard Candy do not even trade on American stock exchanges. And it’s not just the American stock exchanges. These two companies don’t trade on a lot of Asian stock exchanges either.

To buy them, you either have to open up a foreign trading account or purchase them through market makers that have been known to mark the price of foreign stocks up by as much as 15%. This means on a round trip buy and sell of the stock, you’ve lost 30% already. While mark-ups this high are generally rare, it does happen. And most times, because brokers don’t do the research to discover what they’re trading at on the foreign exchanges, they pay these outrageous mark-ups without even realizing that they are doing so.

Sure, your financial consultant may have recommended that you start buying heavily into foreign markets, so you may say that I’m wrong. But think about when this happened. After there was major instability in your domestic markets or before?

Was it a pro-active or re-active decision?

If it was a reactive decision, it’s still better than no reaction, but still this means that there is no forward-thinking about these types of decisions at all. In addition, many times financial consultants at investment firms ignore outstanding companies merely because their firm does not provide analyst reports of this company for them to read. Or they will buy foreign mutual funds that own perhaps 10 great companies mixed among 90 other terrible ones.

Recently, with conflict in the Middle East between Israel and Lebanon, I read an article that stated that money was beginning to flow back into the U.S. dollar for investors seeking a safe haven for their money. Articles like this amaze me due to the complete lack of understanding journalists have about certain economic conditions. Just as they keep telling investors that the U.S. markets are the safest stock markets in the world, they’ll keep telling investors that the U.S. dollar is the safest currency to own – but that’s an entirely different article for another day. Until then, follow the MoneyMites™ to make more money.

KCorner3.gif

Okay, J.S., you earned some points back that you lost the other day. In martial arts, I get so sick of hearing that one style is better than another, especially from the Brazilian jiu-jutsu clan. Jiu-jutsu guys are always walking around saying that jui-jutsu will beat any other style, but when it comes down to it, every martial art has different strengths and weaknesses, and the best thing is to take away the best points from several different art forms. Study too many, and you’ll become the master of none, but if there was one superior art form, then mixed martial arts would not have evolved to where it has today.

So yeah I get your point. Too much singular focus on anything makes for a poor diet. It’s obvious to me that even that new kid on the block, Tony Jaa, as fundamentally strong his Muy Thai strikes are, has supplemented his Muy Thai training with other martial arts.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Quick Technical Analysis: S&P 500
S&P 500 Index Approaching Breakout Level
S&P 500 Bullish?
Ralph Acampora
Read more on S&P 500 at Wikinvest

Entry Filed under: Free Stock Picks, U.S. Stocks, Wealth Literacy

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Seeking Alpha Certified




    Watch our YouTube
    Videos about the
    Monetary Crisis by
    clicking on the logo
    above!





Support independent publishing: buy this book on Lulu.

    Learn the dirty little secrets that investment firms don't want you to know. Click on the image above & learn how to position yourself to benefit, instead of lose, from the crisis!




SmartKnowledgeU™ e-book "Rich Investor, Poor Investor

  • RSS Feeds

      To read a simple explanation of how subscribing to our RSS feed can help you stay informed of our new posts and insure that you don't miss any of our important posts, Click here

                   Add to Technorati Favorites
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Add to My AOL
  • About

      J.S. Kim is the Founder & Managing Director of SmartKnowledgeU™, LLC. He attended the University of Pennsylvania, and received a double master in Business Administration and Public Policy from the University of Texas at Austin. Read more...

    • Kaeho's Corner

      Kaeho is a master martial arts practitioner who has trained in Kyokyushinkai Karate, Mansekan Aikido, Seidokan Aikido, Ba Gua, Chin na, Jui-Jutsu, Aiki-Jutsu, and Gung Fu. Read more...

  • The Underground Investor™

  • Search














  • Posts by Month